Sheriff, leader and my inspiration: How I owe Peyton Manning

Peyton Manning was the reason I first took an interest in NFL.

It was 2009 and I had just started university. I was living away from home for the first time in my life and finding the experience both satisfying and incredibly scary. It’s the paradoxical idea that you want both freedom and the safety and comfort of home. That’s university in a nutshell folks!

In the halls of residence I was in there were two flats per floor. In one flat lived all girls (including myself) and in the flat opposite lived all boys.

I was doing OK I thought for the first month, but I was finding it hard to really gain that sense of comfort away from home. The feeling that you finally felt like you belonged and could settle away from home.

Of course like most evenings at university, this particular one started quietly. Evenings often do start this way (sorry if this breaks the illusion that every night is like a night out of that TV programme Skins!). That was until one of my flatmates, Jade, said the boys next door had invited us round for some drinks. I had met one or two of them before but not all, so as a group we all thought we would get to know the neighbours.

The evening was fun as we got to know each other: where we were from, what we were studying etc. At one point in the evening I heard two of the boys, Perry and Matt, talking about a football match tonight. Now I may be a girl but I know some things about football. Surely they must be talking about highlights, not a live game. They said it was live football, but not soccer. This is when I first got introduced to American Football.

The game they were excited about that night was between the New England Patriots and the Indianapolis Colts. There was only an hour to go until the game started (at 1am no less!) so I decided I wanted to see a bit of it. Only one other flatmate from my flat stayed with me but together with the four boys we went downstairs into the empty common room to watch the game.

Before the game started, Perry and Matt started trying to explain the rules to the rest of us as none of us had watched American Football before. It sounded a little complicated if I’m completely honest so when they said the game would be on until around 4am, I laughed and thought I would never stay up until then.

But I did and it was all because of Peyton Manning.

As I understood it, there was a great competition between Manning and the Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady to be the best quarterback in the sport. And the game played exactly that way. It was almost like a boxing match. Each quarterback kept gaining the upper hand with touchdown passes until it looked like with three minutes to go Brady had finally wrapped up the game.

The Colts were 13 points behind; almost two touchdowns ahead. It was going to take a spectacular finish to win the game.
Manning handed the ball off to the running-back for the first touchdown. But following the converted field goal they were still six points behind and now there was only two minutes left on the clock.

On 4th & 2, the Patriots went for it despite being on their own 28 yard line. They snapped the ball, Brady took it, looked instantly looked to the right and threw it. His teammate Faulk caught it but it was short! The Colts defended well and prevented the Patriots making the it by just half a yard!

It was not over though. The Colts still needed to score another touchdown. Manning worked the ball towards the goal line, simultaneously winding down the clock as well as trying to preserve time for his team to score.

16 seconds were left of the game. We had all stayed up until half 4 in the morning for this one moment. Perry, a Patriots fan, was biting his nails. The rest of us all holding our breath for what was going to happen next.

The ball was snapped to Manning who looked to his left and threw quickly to Reggie Wayne in the end zone.

It felt like a moment frozen in time; in reality it all occurred in a split second. The commentators celebrated, the home crowd became wild and those of us who had managed to stay up until the early hours of the morning all cheered in celebration too (except Perry. Sorry Perry!).

Manning had done it! The Colts had done it! With the last seconds of the game they managed to overhaul a 13-point deficit. It was one of the most exciting sporting events I had ever watched!

I was in awe of Manning. The way he commanded the game; the way he was so calm when the excitement levels were building up at the end.

From then on I knew I was a fan of his and of the sport. Since then I have tried to watch him whenever he played. I was with him through the highs and lows. The season he missed because of his neck injury, his incredibly emotional press conference when leaving the Colts, his record breaking games at his new team the Denver Broncos, the Super Bowl loss to Seattle, through to this year when he ended his career with his second Super Bowl triumph.

He has the record for most career passing yards, most career touchdown passes, most career wins, most touchdown passes in a season and is tied with Bret Favre for most regular season wins as a starting quarterback. He is the only quarterback with 200 career wins, the only QB with at least 6 touchdown passes in three games and is the only starting QB to ever win the Super Bowl with two different teams.

He truly is one of the sport’s greatest ever players.

To me though, he was the reason I first felt comfortable away from home and at university. Surrounded by and enjoying myself with friends, I was introduced to a sport and a player I loved. As a group we always tried to watch games together.

Manning’s career is exceptional and I’m not sure anyone will ever be able to match it.

Thank you Sheriff for you everything.

——————————————————————————-

This post was written by Rachel, 26, from Sheffield.

(Image courtesy of: https://goo.gl/oVtcdq Photo is untouched, and is used for non-commercial reasons).

——————————————————————————-

If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

The good, the bad and the ugly: how the Halo device could improve safety in Formula 1

Last week in Barcelona, Ferrari tested potentially the biggest and most radical design change in Formula 1 history.

The “halo” is a head-protection device that circles around just above the driver’s eye line. Made from carbon fibre, the two arms either side of the driver’s cockpit join together at the front of the car by a central pillar.

It is designed to deflect large and dangerous debris away from the driver’s head.

The favoured design concept by the sport’s governing body, the FIA, it could be introduced for the 2017 season if approved.

But reaction since Barcelona has been divisive.

Reigning world champion Lewis Hamilton was quick to reveal his opinion saying, “Please no! This is the worst looking mod in Formula One history. I appreciate the quest for safety but this is Formula One, and the way it is now is perfectly fine.”

Formula 1 commentator and former driver Martin Brundle too was not a fan. “That looks even worse than I feared, in several respects.”

And they are both right. It is aesthetically unpleasing. Very unpleasing. It ruins the visual and concept that Formula 1 is the pinnacle of aerodynamics. It does not look in tangent with the way a F1 car is designed and surely distracts the driver by obscuring his eyesight.

However there is an important reason the “halo” device has been made. Simply it could have saved lives.

During the Japanese Grand Prix in October 2014, Marussia driver Jules Bianchi lost control of his car in appalling conditions cause by Typhoon Phanfone. The Frenchman crashed into a recovery tractor that was aiding another car that had spun off into the gravel. He suffered severe head injuries resulting in brain surgery, a coma and sadly seven months later his death.

Similarly Formula 2 driver Henry Surtees died from head injuries when hit by a tyre that had become detached from another car colliding with a wall. In 2015 IndyCar driver Justin Wilson also suffered a fatal head injury when the nose cone of another crashed car hit him during an incident.

Whilst the “halo” device may not have saved Bianchi, who suffered a peak impact of 254G, it is believed that such a device would have saved Surtees and Wilson.

Motor racing is an incredibly dangerous sport. The recent and unfortunate deaths prove that whilst much has been achieved to improve the safety of drivers, mechanics, stewards and fans, there is still work to be done.

Motorsport will never be 100% safe. Yet if there is room to improve safety, then surely anything must be tried and tested.

Yes the “halo” device is quite ugly. But as Ferrari driver Sebastian Vettel rightly points out, “it doesn’t look very nice. But if it helps increase the safety and helps save lives, there would be at least two drivers who would still be around – Henry Surtees and Justin Wilson – if we had this type of system.

“It can be ugly but nothing justifies not having these two guys around any more.”

Vettel also pointed out how this is only the first design of the “halo” and further version may improve the device visually.

Hamilton has every right to voice his opinion about a sport he is world champion in. But by being too obsessed with aesthetics he has forgotten about the real importance of the device. And this was only the first test.

It is easy to think of the “halo” device as an ugly technological piece now, but in the future when it saves lives, it may just be remembered as a revolutionary safety device instead.

 


This post was written by the Editor (Edward).

(Image courtesy of: https://goo.gl/039yb3 and Ferrari’s Twitter account. Photo belongs to Ferrari, is untouched, and is used for non-commercial reasons).


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

5 things we learnt from the January transfer window

The January transfer window has come and gone. Now there has been time to reflect on things, here’s a list of lessons we have learnt.

1) The best signing wasn’t even a player

There were some excellent signings made throughout the window including Charlie Austin and Sam Byram. But by far the best signing was Pep Guardiola to Manchester City. The ex Barcelona and current Bayern Munich manager has been a target of City’s for years and his arrival next season is sure to bring excitement and fear to fans of other clubs. Make no mistake – this is a massive coup for City and a damaging blow for their rivals.

2) China has a lot of money!

Premier League clubs spent £175m during January which was more than clubs in the German, Spanish, Italian and French leagues combined. And yet Chinese Super League still spent more than the BPL. The latest signing, Alex Teixeira for £38m, was the fourth time the Asian transfer record was broken during winter and it could be again as their transfer window is still open until the end of February!

3) Watford and Newcastle spent as much as the Bundesliga –

The fact that the Chinese Super League outspent the Premier League is one thing; the fact that previously cash-shy Newcastle United and newly promoted Watford matched the entire German league is another. Newcastle, like many other clubs, have gambled to make sure they remain in the league, signing Andros Townsend, Jonjo Shelvey, Henri Saviet and Seydou Doumbia (loan). Geordie fans have been asking owner Mike Ashley to invest more money into the team for years and they have finally got their wish. Watford meanwhile, who bought four players for a combined cost of £33m, spent more money than any other club in Europe. Now the real test will be to make sure both clubs are still playing Premier League football next season.

4) Clubs gambled hard to win £8bn prize

Seven of the top 10 biggest spenders in Europe were Premier League clubs, and none are currently in the top 6 of the table. Newcastle, Norwich, Stoke, Bournemouth, Everton, Sunderland and Watford have all gambled on being part of next year’s league. Over the next three seasons BPL clubs will receive £8bn, a 50% increase, due to new global broadcasting rights. This means it is crucial to be in the Premier League next season and every club knows this. Apart from Aston Villa. They spent nothing in January despite being bottom of the league.

5) That Sky Sports News and football fans alike were far too excited

It may have been the most expensive January in five years but it was also, before the last few days, one of the most boring. Far too many rumours and speculation and not enough action, we all thought January could play out like it does on FIFA 16 with big players and clubs making moves. In reality big clubs didn’t want to sell or buy and consolidate was the key word for many clubs. This year there was no need for reporters at every ground on transfer deadline day or Jim White even to get excited when Big Ben rang out. It says it all that online Sky Sports News were showing tweets from Harry Kane and Saido Berahino informing followers that they were going to bed early. We all wish we did.


This post was written by Paul. 30 from Manchester.

(Image courtesy of: https://goo.gl/qmXnf8 with use of Creative Commons)


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

Is it right for the England vs France match to go ahead?

It has been four days since the tragic events in Paris that killed 129 people and, rightfully, the world still mourns alongside the French people.

Several co-ordinated acts of cowardly terrorism at a concert venue, restaurants and a football stadium, where the French team were playing Germany at the time, resulted in an unimaginable night for so many, with unfathomable accounts of survival and loss still being painfully revealed days later.

The country is in shock. Paranoia and anxiety have become features of each day and night, in both Parisian streets and other major cities in the western world.

It is against this bleak backdrop that the French Football Federation (FFF) decided that the friendly football match away tonight in England must still go ahead.

But is this the right decision?

The loudest argument you may hear as to why the game should go ahead is also the most defiant. That France must be strong in adversity, it must defeat terror; it must honour the virtues of “liberté, égalité, fraternité” for all. The very essence of terrorism is to create terror, so in its darkest hour France must show it is at its strongest.

Less romantically, some might say that cancelling these events allows the terrorists to win. But this is both delusional to the values of football and demeaning to those who lost loved ones.

The terrorists winning or not cannot be barbarically simplified in a metaphorical football score line, in the same way that a game will not lift entirely the sorrow of families and lovers mourning.

The French players too were personally affected by the horror of Friday night’s events. During the match, an explosion outside the stadium can be heard inside as a suicide bomber detonated himself after failing to get inside. Antoine Griezmann’s sister escaped the Bataclan theatre, where gunmen shot dead 89 people; Lassana Diarra’s cousin however unfortunately died in other attacks in the city. The whole squad spent the night together in the Stade de France, along with the German players.

This makes the FFF’s decision to go ahead with the game against England all the more immeasurable. Why take the players away from their loved ones more than they need to be at this sensitive time?

But instead the FFF, with or without asking the players how they felt depending on which newspaper you read, decided resolutely that they must travel to Wembley Stadium.

There then perhaps lies the basis of their decision. Harsh, impersonal and miscalculated it may initially seem, and may even be now to some, but it’s the idea of resolution that carries the country forward. That to play would be for the greater good.

In the days since the travesty of Friday night, countries all around the world have united with France. They have grieved with the people, they have consoled them and now stand with them.

Renowned former French international player Zinedine Zidane spoke over the weekend about how the 1998 World Cup final win for France at the same stadium almost bombed four nights ago, helped unite the people together. Tonight’s football match against England will hold the same hope for very different reasons.

Like many famous pieces of architecture, the Wembley arch will be emblazoned with the colours of the French flag. And the words of the national anthem will be displayed on screens inside the stadium so that English fans can sing in unison with the French.

It promises to be an emotive and quite possibly a cathartic night of sorrow, passion and declaration.

Of course the match doesn’t matter. Neither does the score line or the analysis. And the French players can and will certainly be forgiven for having their minds elsewhere.

There are far more important things in life than football. But tonight isn’t about football. It is how the event can transcend beyond a match and resonate with so many simultaneously.

I’m still not sure whether it was the right decision for the match to go ahead.

But reading about the efforts the English Football Association are going to, by  decorating Wembley in the tricolore flag and encouraging English fans to sing the French national anthem, alongside the fact that football fans have requested thousands of more tickets in order to fill the stadium, both serves as an inspirational testament and an encouraging insight into the idea that everyone is united with France.

Tonight is about France. It is their opportunity to unite its own people and for the world to show they are united with it. The match will not heal the loss and despair some feel from the absence of loved ones. Nothing may ever will.

But if for one night the world can sing the same anthem in unison, then there will be both a literal and metaphorical truth in the words “liberté, égalité, fraternité”. Tonight’s result will not come from the match; it will come from the people.

 


This post was written by the Editor (Edward).

(Image courtesy of: http://goo.gl/29dXfU and the FA. Image used for noncommercial reasons and in memoriam to those who lost their lives in Paris on 13th November 2015).


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

Chelsea Doctor, give me the news. I’ve got a bad case of respecting you.

There have been two news stories this week about Chelsea Football Club that have come seemingly to their breaking point. The first, manager Jose Mourinho fighting for his job after the club’s worst start to a league season in 37 years. The second, the FA dismissing a discriminatory case against Mourinho for using abusive language towards former club doctor Eva Carneiro, who has now left her job, despite her saying she was never asked to give evidence.

Now one of these is far more important than the other. And whilst you may think I’m talking about Mourinho potentially losing his job following Chelsea’s defeat against Southampton, you would be wrong.

Today’s newspapers feature Mourinho and his tirade on television last night, daring the club’s hierarchy to sack him even though, he believes, he is the best man for the job.

Yet when club doctor Carneiro ran onto the pitch, after being waved on by the referee, to treat Chelsea player Eden Hazard, leaving Mourinho’s 10 man side down to 9 for the last moments of the 2-2 draw at home to Swansea City, she was scolded by Mourinho, allegedly verbally discriminated against, banned from interaction with the players, and ultimately allowed to walk away from the club.

This week the FA finalised their case into her eventual resignation concluding that Mourinho would face no further actions over allegations he verbally discriminated Carneiro after failing to find evidence to suggest otherwise.

They appointed an independent academic expert to assess whether the words used by Mourinho on the touchline on that day were discriminatory or not.

But this was not good enough for Women in Football, a network of professional women working in the football industry. In a statement released following the FA’s verdict, they said they were “appalled” by the governing body’s decision.

“Contrary to the FA’s appointed expert’s advice, which WiF has not seen, our own language expert made it abundantly clear that the abusive words used by Mr Mourinho on the touchline that day were specifically directed towards a woman, as indicated by the grammar of his sentence.

“WiF can only conclude that this latest investigation provides yet another damning example of the FA failing to tackle discrimination, specifically sexism, in the football industry” (source).

The statement by Women in Football was then seemingly further vindicated when Carneiro, who had until now stayed silent on the matter other than to thank her supporters on social media, issued her own statement saying at no point was she “requested by the FA to make a statement” (source).

The FA argued that Carneiro was not called forward as a witness as she herself had not submitted the claim or complaint against Mourinho. In fact a member of the public had. Yet to omit her evidence from the investigation shows a lack of sense and respect.

Heather Rabbatts, an independent board member and the head of the FA’s inclusion advisory board, criticised the decision not to interview Carneiro.

Even FA chairman Greg Dyke expressed his regret over the saga claiming Mourinho made a mistake and should have apologised.

As a female football fan I find it both hard to understand and justify to others the clear lack of respect that Carneiro has been shown throughout her ordeal. The worse thing however is that her treatment is symbolic of the treatment that many other female professionals have to live with.

Female footballers are constantly rated on their looks rather than their skill; their inclusion in this year’s FIFA video game series drew sexist jokes from male gamers. And if you type in Eva Carneiro’s name into Google, one of the next searched terms relating to her is “hot pictures”.

In her statement Carneiro spoke of other times she had been verbally abused. Rabbats herself also spoke of the FA’s failure to act on past examples of sexist and abusive chanting towards the doctor by fans.

And all this is occurring against the backdrop of the twenty-first century and a time where the female national teams are actually outperforming the men at World Cups.

The main subject this week however though is whether Mourinho should lose his job. Unfortunately somebody else already has.


This post was written by Jenny, 29 from London.

(Image courtesy of: https://goo.gl/ZSOFQj with use of Creative Commons)


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

Top 5 Premier League Transfers this summer

With the new Premier League season starting this weekend, George from Birmingham has looked at what he believes are the best transfers of the summer so far.

Disagree with George’s opinion? Submit your own article here: wldeditor@outlook.com


5. Jordan Amavi (Aston Villa). £9m

In his brief spell in charge at Tottenham Hotspur, manager Tim Sherwood was not given the chance to make changes to the squad he inherited. Yet from his personal coaching style with the players and close attention to detail when on the touchline, you just knew he would have a canny eye if ever given a transfer window and budget to play with.

So in this summer window, his first for new club Aston Villa, he may just prove that to be true.

The signings of a rejuvenated Micah Richards, Scott Sinclair on a permanent deal and young French midfielder Jordan Veretout all stand out, and each one could easily warrant their own place on this list. However I’ve gone for the signing of Jordan Amavi. The U21 French left-back from Nice has promising potential, and has been known to venture forward in support of the attackers. Both Veretout and Amavi could be representing the French senior team sooner rather than later and whilst £9m may seem quite high for such a young player, Amavi may prove his worth before long.

  1. Roberto Firmino and Nathaniel Clyne (Liverpool). £21.3m (Firmino) and £10m (Clyne)

Ok, a slight bit of cheating here but I’ve gone for the signings of Firmino and Clyne by Liverpool as #4.

So Firmino first. Who is he? A Brazilian attacking midfielder, who can also play up-front, Firmino signed from German side Hoffenheim for £21.3m. He’s not the quickest in the world but he certainly knows, like many Brazilian footballers, what he’s doing with the ball. A technical dribbler and accomplished passer, he will be a wonderful antagonist for Coutinho. Certainly the price is a little high, but considering he cost half of what Sterling was sold for, once again this could prove to be wonderful business.

Manager Brendan Rodgers spent unwisely last summer following the departure of Luis Suarez, but this year he knew the type of players he wanted and got them early in the summer. Whilst others signed before Clyne, for a long time it seemed the former Southampton defender was on his way to Anfield. A perfect replacement for Glen Johnson, who was far too much a vulnerability defensively at times, Clyne is the perfect blend of both attack and defence. If fellow former Southampton player Luke Shaw is worth £30m, as sold, than Clyne for a third of that is very clever business for Rodgers. He will be Liverpool’s right-back for years to come.

  1. André Ayew (Swansea) Free

The most optimistic fan will say a free transfer is always a good transfer. I mean after all, it didn’t cost anything! Yet to sign a player like Ayew, Swansea had to pay a lot of money. First his wages. At £60k a week, Ayew is Swansea’s highest earner by reportedly at least £20,000. And then there was the small matter of convincing the Ghanaian to come to Wales. That cost the club £5.7m.

But don’t let those numbers put you off. Ayew is a fantastic signing for Swansea. The fact they beat off reported interest from Arsenal, Liverpool, Bayer Leverkusen, AC Milan and Roma just shows you how much of a coup manager Gary Monk has pulled off in bringing Ayew to Wales.

I have always been a fan of Monk. The way he has effortlessly settled into management is truly remarkable, and with a little more financial backing thanks to the Premier League’s new TV deal, Monk is showing his eye for putting together a fantastic squad. A signing such as Ayew shows the Swans want to move higher up the table, and under Monk I believe they really can. Together with Sigurdsson and Dyer, I expect big things from Swansea this season.

  1. Petr Cech (Arsenal) £10.9m

The Czech goalkeeper was always going to feature in this list but he just misses out on the top spot. However his transfer to North London after 11 years at Chelsea still represents a truly fantastic signing by Arsène Wenger.

It is common knowledge that Wenger does not always like to spend money. But when a player can offer you 12 to 15 points extra per season, in the words of Chelsea captain John Terry, even Wenger had to pounce for Cech’s signature.

Certainly there are areas that Arsenal still need to improve on. A centre-back and a striker are needed to fully challenge for the Premier League title. But Cech represents a significant improvement on last year’s squad alone. At 33 some might argue he is too old, however for a goalkeeper that is a perfect age. Sir Alex Ferguson signed Edwin Van der Sar at the age of 34 and both went on to win the title four times and the Champions League once during the Dutchman’s six years at the club.

Cech’s experience will benefit not only Arsenal’s defence but also the entire squad. The four-time Premier League winner will provide much needed assurance and organisation sometimes lacking in the Gunners back four, and there is no doubting his transfer only makes Arsenal stronger and Chelsea weaker.

Could Arsenal really challenge for the title this season? I still think they need another striker and defender, but with Cech in their team they won’t be too far away from the top.

  1. Yohan Cabaye (Crystal Palace) £10m

Crystal Palace, in signing French midfielder Yohan Cabaye from PSG, have pulled off not only the best transfer of the summer but quite possibly one of the best transfers in the last few years.

Bought for less than what manager Alan Pardew, then at Newcastle, sold him to PSG for a year and a half ago, this transfer has the potential to significantly alter the league. Along with the loan signing of Patrick Bamford, Palace are showing true ambition to climb up the table and they could easily be a surprise package this year.

Cabaye will bring control and guile that was sometimes lacking in Palace’s midfield last season, particularly at home where they lost 10 games. But his arrival too will mean Palace will believe they can start to challenge for places in Europe, and glory in the cup competitions. And why shouldn’t they?

It’s hard to believe that just two seasons ago Palace were dangerously close to being relegated before Tony Pulis came in and saved them. Now they are looking to finish higher than the 10th they managed last season, and with signings such as Cabaye it’s certainly possible.


This post was written by George, 21 from Birmingham.

(Image courtesy of: https://goo.gl/8fLdH8  with use of Creative Commons)


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

I went to my first Sheffield Wednesday game on Yorkshire Day and this is what happened

A preseason game in August played under a changing collage of blue and grey skies, sunshine and rain. It was only natural then that on Yorkshire Day, I had to rely on a cup of Yorkshire Tea to warm myself up in the drizzle at times.

Yet this was my first Yorkshire Day in Sheffield and I planned to make the most of it.

On a day that celebrated the heritage and tradition of England’s largest county, it made sense to attend a football game at one of the oldest football clubs in the country, at one of the most iconic stadiums in the world.

Hillsborough, so long synonymous with tragedy, is also longer renowned and celebrated for more positive reasons.

Home to Sheffield Wednesday since the nineteenth century, it has hosted World Cup and European Championship games over the last 116 years. It is also a home for local families.

I spoke to a lot of fans before the preseason friendly against Scottish side St. Mirren. Most I spoke to have been Owls fans for at least two decades. A tradition and heritage passed from their parents to them at birth, and now they were bringing their own children to their first game at Hillsborough.

It was also my first game at the stadium too.

I caught the tram from the city centre to the ground, travelling away from the bright lights of the seaside carnival organised on Fargate to celebrate Yorkshire Day and into suburban Sheffield.

On the tram there were old fans and young fans, some fans with new shirts on emblazoned with the name of the new Thai owner, and some fans with shirts adorned with no sponsorship or squad names. There were those with friends, and those with their family; their parents or children. Yet regardless of age or background, all were united in their support and excitement to go watch their team play at home for the first time this preseason. A new season always brings new hope.

But as with most football clubs, the juxtaposition of old fans and young fans mirrors the club’s own balance of tradition and modernity.

A new Portuguese manager, Wednesday’s first non-British manager, with knowledge of continental Europe arguably challenges tradition. The latest acquisition of Wednesday’s own revolving carousel of players coming in or out, a young player from the manger’s homeland that as many fans told me they were looking forward to see play, even if they couldn’t remember or pronounce his name. But as most fans I spoke to pointed out, a change of direction for the team might also mean a change of luck for the club.

After all, one of the oldest clubs in the country, with the largest stadium in the league and a support base throughout the county and beyond, something doesn’t add up to why Wednesday are where they are.

It is an interesting time for a club seeking a path back to the top flight of English football.

But back to Yorkshire Day.

Walking through the nearby park where young fans using jumpers for goalposts could play football, imagining themselves playing for Wednesday, the shadow of the stadium rose up above the trees.

Unmistakeable with its outer blue décor, Hillsborough looked unique if not gracious in age. Whereas other teams have sacrificed character for modern stadia, Sheffield Wednesday’s approach to staying at Hillsborough, at least for the time being, seemed poetically nostalgic.

As I joined families walking through the turnstiles though it could already be seen that the new foreign owners had already started making some modern amendments to the ground. One such hit was the new large screen in the corner between the South and West stand. Showing immediate highlights of goals and near misses, it was also an outlet to advertise, you guessed it, more Yorkshire Tea.

And whether it was the quick turn of cloud coverage and rain, or the subliminal messaging, there I stood with my tea alongside a vociferous, partisan crowd cheering on regardless of weather at players they had not seen play before (because as one fan put it: “Anybody who puts a shirt on, we’ll be happy to see them. So long as they put an effort in”).

After all, this is Yorkshire and this was my first trip to Hillsborough. A traditional place with a modern twist I thought. Perhaps it won’t be too long before the club serve Portuguese stew alongside Yorkshire Tea.


Editor’s note: This post was written by Rachel, 26 from Sheffield.

Photo rights belong to Rachel.


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

Is Arsene Wenger right to criticise United’s transfer policy?

It has already been another busy summer transfer window for Manchester United and manager Louis van Gaal.

The Red Devils have spent almost £80m on four new additions so far, including young talent Memphis Depay and World Cup winner Bastian Schweinsteiger.

But this has led to some questions from rival manager, Arsenal’s Arsene Wenger.

The Gunners are on tour in Singapore currently, and Wenger chose his latest press conference to raise his concerns about United’s transfer policy, specifically choosing to spend huge sums of money rather than promote youth players.

“Most of the clubs who have been successful are clubs who have [promoted youth players]. You can take Barcelona or Man United, who had a generation and built their success on players who came from within.

“With United’s success they have created huge financial resources and today there is no patience for them to continue what they did.

“They have the financial resources to go with a different policy. And they do not have available players like Paul Scholes, Ryan Giggs and David Beckham inside the club”.

Wenger then somewhat mischievously added: “we want to continue to give chances to young players and build the players from inside our club with our culture. These are our values and it is our DNA and it’s important we keep that.” (source)

But are these comments fair?

It is common knowledge that following Sir Alex Ferguson’s retirement, United’s squad needed renovation. The starting eleven averaged an age of almost 28, and new vigour and better-quality secondary players were a priority.

So many will see van Gaal’s two summer transfer windows, and even David Moyes’ signings of Juan Mata and Marouane Fellaini in his solitary season in charge, as testament to that fact, regardless of how much money is spent.

And yet United have named one Youth player in every match day squad since 1937; that’s over 3500 matches. It was a tradition that van Gaal kept last season, rotating his squad throughout the year and giving chances to fourteen former Youth team players.

So have United really lost their identity?

In the last three seasons, Moyes and van Gaal have bought thirteen players, with Luke Shaw being the only British player signed. Compare that to Ferguson’s last three seasons in charge before retirement where he bought four home-grown players.

But whilst it can be argued that United are still playing with some, though seemingly not many, British players still, examples of youth players promoted and kept in the senior squad during Moyes and van Gaal’s time is rather sparse. In Ferguson’s more recent squads before retirement, players such as Danny Welbeck, Tom Cleverly, Ryan Giggs, Jonny Evans, Paul Scholes and Darren Fletcher all had places. All these players bar Evans have now been sold by Ferguson’s successors (Giggs and Scholes retired), with many youth players only playing once in the League under van Gaal last season.

The Class of ‘92 that produced players such as David Beckham, Paul Scholes, Ryan Giggs, brothers Gary and Phil Neville and Nicky Butt was certainly an extraordinary one-off of British talent. All dominated United’s first XI for the next decade. Only Southampton have come close to producing single-handedly such talented players, albeit over a longer period of time.

But certainly times have proven hard for young players to make their mark and earn a consistent place in van Gaal’s squad.

The Dutchman is known to be a demanding manager, and has shown at times he is not afraid of falling out with big players.

Rivaldo, van Bommel, Luca Toni, van Persie and more recently Victor Valdes have all fallen afoul of van Gaal’s temper.

And on the other side of the argument is the thought that even though the players signed aren’t British, have United had value for money looking elsewhere?

In an age where it is common for some players to easily be sold for close to £50m, including recently the £49m sale of Sterling from Liverpool to rivals Manchester City, Schweinsteiger at £14.4m seems to be a piece of clever and shrewd business.

Following United’s lowly seventh position under Moyes, the club needed success to come sooner rather than later. And since Ferguson’s own first years at the club, it has become common practice to see clubs emerging into championship contenders thanks in part to the investment of a billionaire owner.

The saying goes “money talks” and that is what van Gaal is doing. If the first year was a transition year for the club, then van Gaal needed to evaluate all players at his disposal before then signing the ones he wanted this summer and next, to compete with the likes of Chelsea and City.

Whether or not Wenger should look to concentrate on improving his own squad is a matter for (Arsenal) fans to consider. And they do. A lot. Whether or not he is right or van Gaal continues to use Youth players now he has started transforming the squad into his own, remains to be seen. This season will be an important one for United’s Youth.


(Image courtesy of: https://goo.gl/OqpEVw with use of Creative Commons)

Why Liverpool are wrong to sell Sterling

Liverpool striker Raheem Sterling is on the verge of signing for Manchester City, and will become the most expensive English player ever, after the two clubs agreed to a £49m fee.

The 20-year-old Englishman twice failed to turn up for pre-season training and even asked to be left out of Liverpool’s squad for their pre-season tour of Thailand, following on from his reported falling out last season with, and refusal to play under, Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers.

But were Liverpool right to cash in on Sterling? Two writers and fans make their point:


First Suarez, then Gerrard. Now Sterling!

I too am a Liverpool fan but I do not believe selling Sterling is the right decision.

No club wants to be known as a selling club, but that is slowly what we are becoming.

I understand both Suarez and Sterling have their flaws both on and off the pitch. Both wanted to ultimately move on and both were or are being sold for a fair price. But they also single-handedly on occasions scored goals and won Liverpool games. They provided a spark to a lethargic team and the team were stronger with one or both of them in the side.

The club tried once to replace Suarez last summer with eight players, costing collectively over £100m. And it can easily be argued that none of those eight helped solve the problem of selling Suarez.

This summer already six players have been brought in, with two of those free and one, Danny Ings, free also until a tribunal assesses how much compensation Liverpool should pay Burnley. But already Liverpool have spent £34.8m of the potentially £39.2m Liverpool will eventually receive for selling Sterling to Manchester City (QPR are entitled to 20% of any sell on fee, due to a clause in the terms when Sterling was originally sold to Liverpool).

Now I applaud any positive attempts by the club to improve the squad and buy new players. But last season proved this doesn’t always work.

And now we have lost our captain too, who even in his seventeenth and last season for Liverpool was our top goal-scorer.

Liverpool are beginning to lose one identity and gain another, and if the owners are not careful with retaining the club’s strongest players, their goal of winning trophies will evermore slowly keep moving away from them into the distance.

All players eventually think about or want to leave the club they are playing for. But when contracts are signed, that means both parties make a contractual obligation. Sterling had two more years on his contract but instead of finishing out those two years and attempting to win a trophy with us, he will now play those two seasons with a rival team trying to win one for them.

Gerrard too said that if he had been given a contract offer earlier in the season, he would have stayed. For a long time, our new captain Jordan Henderson struggled in contractual talks with the club.

There seems to be two problems with the way the club is run at the moment. One is contracts, and the other is selling its best players. It is hard to see how we can compete with our rivals like Man City, United, Arsenal and Chelsea when we keep losing our best players.

Manchester City are gambling that Sterling fulfils his potential by paying so much for him. And maybe he will. It’s just a shame that they will now reap the benefit of him, present and future, rather than us.


Editor’s note: This post was written by Paul, 37, from Sheffield.

To read the alternative feature, “Why Liverpool were right to sell Sterling”, click here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/2015/07/13/why-liverpool-are-right-to-sell-sterling/


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

(Image courtesy of https://goo.gl/CRV22r with use of Creative Commons)

Why Liverpool are right to sell Sterling

Liverpool striker Raheem Sterling is on the verge of signing for Manchester City, and will become the most expensive English player ever, after the two clubs agreed to a £49m fee.

The 20-year-old Englishman twice failed to turn up for pre-season training and even asked to be left out of Liverpool’s squad for their pre-season tour of Thailand, following on from his reported falling out last season with, and refusal to play under, Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers.

But were Liverpool right to cash in on Sterling? Two writers and fans make their point:


Good riddance!

Sorry, I had to let that out. I’m a Liverpool fan.

You may have guessed that from the opening sentence. Nevertheless I shall refrain from any outbursts (if I can) for the remainder of the case I shall present, which is I believe that Liverpool are right to sell Raheem Sterling.

It has appeared for quite a long time now, at least since January when he turned down two contracts offered by Liverpool, that Sterling wished to leave Merseyside.

He has always stated that it was about wanting more opportunities to win silverware rather than money. But this “honesty” was just another example of the player disrespecting the club who signed him from QPR as a fifteen year old.

Sterling now is only 20 years old. Many fans and pundits alike say he has great potential. But he is not a great player yet. He is a good player with much still to learn.

Liverpool are selling one of their strongest players, one who can often give the team a spark they sometimes creatively lack, and to a rival team as well. But no player is bigger than any club and without his disruptive manner and the money the club will receive, Liverpool will be better off without him.

Manchester City need English players to meet the FA’s current home-grown players rule. Every Premier League club must have at least eight English or Welsh players in the twenty-five man squads they submit to the governing body at the start of the season.

Going into this season, Man City only have three “home-grown” players.

Liverpool have not only been sensible in selling Sterling to a rival for a high figure, they have also exploited City’s need to boost their quota of home-grown players. After two failed bids, City had no option than to effectively meet Liverpool’s high evaluation.

Sterling may one day become the best English player in the world, but right now he not worthy of being called that. Man City have paid for potential and Liverpool have justifiably sold, and seemingly already used the potential money to replace Sterling with Roberto Firmino from Hoffenheim, whilst making a profit and removing any negativity Sterling may have had in the dressing room.

It’s true that Sterling on a number of occasions was the catalyst to a dismal Liverpool team. A creative spark with energy and flair, he always lacked any fear regardless of who he was playing against.

But the maturity he had on the field often left him off it, and whether swayed by his agent or not, he still showed Liverpool a lack of respect. Whether that was giving interviews without the club’s permission, being caught on camera inhaling nitrous oxide, or even honestly stating the reason he wanted to leave Liverpool was to win trophies (a thinly veiled attack Raheem on how you perceive your own club and teammates!).

It’s always a little disappointing to see a promising player leave your club, but ultimately every player has his price. Liverpool held out for £50m and received £49m. And in the process signed more players (with more you never know on the way) and strengthened the squad by removing any negativity. Sterling provided spark, but he is only 20 years old and only scored 18 goals in 95 Premier League games for Liverpool. £49m for a player with those stats is a figure I think most teams would take.

Now let’s hope the signings to replace Sterling work better than the signings to replace Suarez last season!


Editor’s note: This post was written by Louise, 23, from Liverpool.

To read the alternative feature, “Why Liverpool were wrong to sell Sterling”, click here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/2015/07/13/why-liverpool-are-wrong-to-sell-sterling/


If you would like to write an article or feature for WinLoseDraw, you can learn how to do so here: https://winlosedrawmag.wordpress.com/about/

(Image courtesy of https://goo.gl/CRV22r with use of Creative Commons)